Choose UUIDs for model IDs in Rails

These are a native column type in PostgreSQL. You can find more details on native Postgres types in the Rails Guides.

Instead of…

…using Rails’ default incrementing integer id.

Use…

…PostgreSQL’s UUID support. Ruby on Rails has had the ability to use UUIDs as the id for ActiveRecord models since version 5.0.

Enable the PostgreSQL extension

bin/rails g migration enable_extension_for_uuid

class EnableExtensionForUuid < ActiveRecord::Migration[5.1]
  def change
    enable_extension 'pgcrypto' unless extension_enabled?('pgcrypto')
  end
end

Create config/initializers/generators.rb

Rails.application.config.generators do |g|
  g.orm :active_record, primary_key_type: :uuid
end

This changes the default column type for primary keys, configuring your migration generator to set id: :uuid for new tables.

In future migrations

You’ll have to use type: :uuid when creating relations.

class AddNewTable < ActiveRecord::Migration[5.1]
  def change
    create_table :related_model do |t|
      t.references :other, type: :uuid, index: true
    end
  end
end

But why?

Using UUIDs as the id in your Rails models instead of incrementing integers helps you avoid collisions. The UUIDs are globally unique meaning you can know that different models cannot possibly have the same id and you can even assign them client-side or in other systems.

With an incrementing integer id the size of your data can be inferred from the outside i.e. id 5 is the fifth record created. With UUIDs no-one can guess the size of your database tables, which might be information you are keen to keep secret. You can get round this by generating ‘public ids’ or ‘slugs’ for exposed URLs… but then, why not use a built-in tool?

From a security perspective, using UUIDs prevents the situation where a malicious attacker could attempt to gain access to data by guessing a model id in your URLs. UUIDs are extremely hard to guess.

This is a case where you are making a choice toward a little more complexity, but for good reasons.

Why not?

If you’re using PostgreSQL this is a straightforward change and has little performance cost. MySQL is a more complicated proposition and I wouldn’t bother.

ActiveRecord’s first and last scopes work in an unexpected way with UUID ids. You can no longer assume the ‘highest’ id is the most recent, which could be confusing for new developers to your codebase.

Using UUIDs is a good idea in brand new projects, but it might be wise to avoid transferring to UUIDs in a running production system unless you have a good reason to do so.

Translated into Japanese here

Translated into Turkish here